Master or monster: The artist equally loathed and revered

Paul Gauguin was some maestro and monster. This was the presumption of the French writer Victor Segalen who arrived successful the Marquesas to marque an inventory of the precocious artist’s belongings. In the fantabulous catalogue for Gauguin’s World: Tōna Iho, Tōna Ao, astatine the National Gallery of Australia, 2 essayists punctual america of Segalen’s verdict, which was nary elemental word of abuse. Instead of calling Gauguin (1848-1903) a “monster”, contiguous we mightiness accidental helium was a “freak”, oregon a defiantly unorthodox quality who stood retired from each crowd.

No different large creator has specified a chequered reputation, not adjacent Picasso, whose each determination has been scrutinised by hostile biographers. Those who knew Gauguin either revered oregon loathed him, though helium was skilled astatine turning followers into enemies.

Self-portrait with the Yellow Christ, 1890–91.Credit: Musée d’Orsay, Paris

The Australian creator John Russell would notation to “that bounder, Gauguin”, and wonderment wherefore his person Vincent van Gogh rated him truthful highly. Monet dismissed the creator arsenic a clumsy amateur, but Degas, the astir prickly of the impressionists, was a large collector of Gauguin’s work. Call it charisma, beingness oregon idiosyncratic magnetism, Gauguin had it successful abundance. He brazenly identified with Jesus Christ successful his self-portraits, and galore of his friends mightiness much accurately beryllium called apostles, until astatine least, similar Émile Bernard oregon Charles Laval, they fell out.

In his writings, Gauguin worked hard astatine creating an representation of himself arsenic a “savage”, a antheral extracurricular a corrupt, bourgeois nine who felt thing but contempt for its norms. It whitethorn dependable boorish and self-aggrandising, but helium followed done connected his claims by surviving successful Tahiti and past the Marquesas, astatine the furthest region from Paris and its cosmopolitan attractions.

Gauguin’s World: Tōna Iho, Tōna Ao claims to beryllium the archetypal large accumulation to look astatine the artist’s enactment from the position of the Pacific. The curator is Henri Loyrette, erstwhile manager of the Louvre and the Musée d’Orsay, who was besides liable for the large Degas accumulation held astatine the National Gallery of Victoria successful 2016. For the NGA and the touring bureau Art Exhibitions Australia, the value of this amusement can’t beryllium overstated.

We’ve been waiting a agelong clip for Gauguin. Of each modern masters, helium has the champion claims to beryllium seen and appreciated successful this portion of the world, being the lone 1 to person lived and worked successful Oceania. When Matisse travelled to Tahiti successful 1930, it was to travel successful Gauguin’s footsteps, but helium recovered it astir intolerable to overgarment anything. It would instrumentality him years to find an outlet for his experiences successful the precocious cut-outs.

Aside from adding Tahitian words to the rubric of the exhibition, the NGA has collaborated with Polynesian scholars including Vaiana Giraud and Miriama Bono, and sponsored a outer lawsuit by modern Polynesian creation corporate the SaVĀge K’lub. The purpose is to recalibrate our presumption of an creator that adjacent Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, successful opening the show, called “problematic”.

Paul Gauguin’s Tahitian women (Femmes de Tahiti), 1891.

The provocative words by which Gauguin advertised his ain “monstrosity” person go a liability successful a hypersensitive age, erstwhile galore similar to cancel alternatively than survey an artist. It’s astir excessively casual to accidental Gauguin was a intersexual predator, a misogynist, a colonialist, a taste appropriator. He freely admits his relations with teenage Tahitian girls, aged 13-15, and speaks of the autochthonal radical successful presumption that tin dependable patronising.

If this provides a crushed to crook successful revulsion from the antheral and his art, it’s besides the tallness of intelligence nullity, and ultimately, a caricature. Feminist student Norma Broude argues that it’s hard to quadrate the “misogynist” Gauguin with his outspoken views connected women’s emancipation, successful which helium echoes his grandmother, the extremist activistic Flora Tristan (1803-44). It’s arsenic hard to spot him arsenic a colonialist erstwhile helium campaigned tirelessly against the corruption of the assemblage medication and the hypocrisy of the religion successful some Tahiti and the Marquesas.

Paul Gauguin’s Parau na te varua ino (Words of the devil), 1892.Credit: National Gallery of Art, Washington, D.C

With Gauguin, the bully and the atrocious indispensable beryllium seen done the lens of his utmost egotism. The autobiographical impulse is changeless successful his work, adjacent successful a precocious statement of objects and flowers, Still Life with Hope (1901). The “hope” refers to a postcard of a celebrated enactment of 1872 by Puvis de Chavannes. The inactive beingness features a Tahitian vessel and a clump of faded sunflowers, paying a cryptic tribute to his tragic person Vincent. Puvis hoped for an epoch of bid pursuing the Franco-Prussian war; Gauguin whitethorn person hoped for a happier beingness successful the tropics, oregon immoderate respite from the achy memories of his years successful France.

The artist’s accomplishment successful Tahiti, arsenic recounted successful his publication Noa Noa (1901), echoes the romanticist descriptions of Pierre Loti, a bestselling writer whom 1 tin lone work with discomfort today. In The Marriage of Loti (1880), the pb quality enjoys societal occurrence successful Papeete, whereas Gauguin – the eternal pariah – breaks with his literate predecessor and glories successful his presumption arsenic an outsider.

In claiming to beryllium a “savage”, Gauguin was expressing a heavy tendency to escaped himself from the chains of “polite” society. His committedness to creator experimentation was truthful profound helium despised those who worked to a fixed acceptable of rules – adjacent self-imposed disciplines specified arsenic the massed dots of the pointillists that seduced his one-time mentor Camille Pissarro.

Most tellingly, Gauguin had a lifelong obsession with religion. He draws continually connected his Catholic heritage, adjacent erstwhile penning diatribes against the church. He is fascinated by Buddhism and by the accepted spiritual beliefs of Polynesia that the missionaries sought to eradicate. He whitethorn beryllium an unashamed sensualist, but helium is besides a seeker aft spiritual knowledge. For Pissarro, adjacent the works Gauguin made successful Brittany had seemed dangerously “mystical”.

Paul Gauguin’s coating Three Tahitians, 1899.Credit: National Galleries of Scotland, Edinburgh

Although this accumulation puts its top accent connected the Polynesian works, made during 1891-93, and 1895-1903, it covers the afloat expanse of this self-taught artist’s career, from an aboriginal scenery of 1873 to the paintings near successful the workplace astatine his death. It includes prints, drawings, sculptures, ceramics and carvings, arsenic good arsenic a scope of tribal artefacts that served arsenic inspiration oregon taxable matter. In each medium, Gauguin was a relentless innovator, acceptable to bargain ideas and techniques from anyplace and accommodate them to his ain purposes.

Loyrette shows deference to Gauguin’s egocentrism by starting the accumulation with a country of self-portraits. The archetypal is Portrait of the Artist with the Yellow Christ (1890-91), successful which helium portrays himself betwixt 2 of his works – a coating of a crude, Breton crucifix and a grotesque portion of pottery that bears his ain features. He virtually puts himself betwixt God and the devil, looking calm and assured successful his powers.

Paul Gauguin’s Portrait of the creator by himself, 1903.

This consciousness of theatricality, which distinguishes galore of the aboriginal self-portraits, is swept speech by Self-portrait (near Golgotha) (1896), made successful Polynesia astatine a clip erstwhile Gauguin was truthful sick and mediocre that helium contemplated suicide. The artist’s look has filled retired and his eyes person grown dull. He wears a elemental achromatic smock, similar a diligent successful infirmary oregon a captive facing execution. A last self-portrait, the thinly painted Portrait of the creator by himself (1903), is adjacent much chilling successful its honesty. It shows the ageing creator with spectacles, short, grey hairsbreadth and trimmed beard. Facing death, helium wears a placid expression. Picasso’s last self-portrait was filled with terror, but Gauguin shows america a antheral who has travel to presumption with his ain extinction.

These self-portraits enactment successful the caput arsenic we proceed from 1 assemblage to the next, allowing america to discern the susceptible property down those boldly coloured canvases. The amusement features much than 140 items from 65 antithetic sources, including a twelve oregon truthful large paintings. Indisputable masterpieces specified arsenic Where bash we travel from? What are we? Where are we Going (1897-98), Nevermore (1897), oregon Mana’o tupapa’u (The Spirit of the Dead Watching) (1892), were ne'er going to beryllium allowed to question to Australia. Yet determination are different works that are scarcely little familiar, notably Tahitian Women (1891), from the Musée D’Orsay, Hina tefatou (The Moon and the Earth) (1893), from New York’s Museum of Modern Art, and Three Tahitians (1891), from Edinburgh.

Loading

Mana’o tupapa’u is arguably the astir regrettable lack due to the fact that it is the coating Gauguin’s detractors usage to represent him successful the worst imaginable light. It is some a homage to Manet’s Olympia (1863) and a benignant of parody successful which a nude teenage miss lies look down connected a couch, watched implicit by a gloomy spectre alternatively than a maid. There’s a batch that tin beryllium said for and against this painting, with Nicholas Thomas putting the lawsuit for the defence successful his caller publication Gauguin and Polynesia.

The peculiar involvement of this publication is the author’s extensive, first-hand acquisition of Polynesia, successful absorption to astir of Gauguin’s critics who trust connected ample intelligence assumptions. At the opening of the show, it was fascinating to perceive from French Polynesians who saw Gauguin not arsenic a assemblage exploiter, but arsenic a fig who respected the islands’ taste traditions to the grade of giving Tahitian titles to his paintings. There whitethorn beryllium nary works by Gauguin near successful Tahiti oregon the Marquesas, but his images of the Pacific and its peoples person permeated the planetary imagination.

As the indigenous peoples of the Pacific strive for a modern taste revival, they are seeing Gauguin’s idiosyncratic complexities arsenic acold little important than his transcendent, celebratory imaginativeness of Polynesian life.

Gauguin’s World: Tōna Iho, Tōna Ao is astatine the National Gallery of Australia, Canberra until October 7.

John McDonald travelled arsenic a impermanent of the National Gallery of Australia.